The
knowledge of the I-Ching and its relation to the martial art known as pakua
(bagua) can be a very debatable subject among today’s practitioners. In the early
days of pakua, as a martial arts, there is little doubt that the practitioners
were aware of its connection to the ancient text of the I-Ching. How much any
given practitioner studied the I-Ching or even understood some of its ideas is
not truly known.
Now that
the martial art of pakua has entered the twenty first century we see many
practitioner that are far removed from Dong Hai Chuan and his first students,
and some that have a lineage as close as 3rd and 4th
generation. Some of these practitioners are excellent martial artists, some of
them acknowledge the link of pakua and the I-Ching, other see the link as
important and study the I-Ching and its teachings, others claim the link as
ridiculous, and write it off as mysticism that is so often intertwined in the
martial arts.
I would
not claim to be better than or hold more knowledge about pakua than the
practitioners who do not “believe in”, research, or try to understand the
principals of the I-Ching, but I personally believe there is a great amount of
knowledge and benefits of researching and correlating the I-Ching with pakua. I
do not practice mysticism nor do I predict the future, but the I-Ching and its
relation to pakua is an important part of understanding pakua as a complete art
and not just a “martial” art.
The
evasiveness of pakua, its deadly palm strikes, its unmatched ability to blend
and use effortless throws, its effectiveness, as a fighting art are very
important. Pakua’s smooth and rooted forms, the flowing and always moving
techniques, the unseen and unstoppable force it yields are all a very important
aspects of pakua. These are all teachable and obtainable results of the
practice and study of pakua the martial arts, but to obtain the highest level I
believe the skill set goes way beyond the mentioned aspects. Certainly the fore
mentioned aspects of pakua must be reached to obtain an even higher level, but
I believe to reach this level a basic understanding of the I-Ching must be met.
We must remember that beyond the physical aspects of pakua lies a foundation of philosophies and the underlying idea to all of them is change. Pakua is based on changes and change must always be present in pakua. Changes are first taught as “palm” changes, these “changes” teach the basics of change, and the combination sets teach how things can change, and the link between the changes. When one can constantly change with no thought or intention, he has reached what I would deem as the highest level anyone can reach in any martial arts, of course the changing must naturally exhibit the correct movements of pakua at all times.
It is
thought that the I Ching concept was 4000 years old when it was first printed,
3000 years ago, so we are working with some ancient knowledge and the fact that
it has been interpreted and rewritten numerous times. Fu His is credited as the
founder but King Wang and his son had a heavy influence on the I-Ching as well.
In my study of the I-Ching I have research several interpretations of it and my
understanding stems from both Fu His and the Wang’s, though I tend to lean
toward Fu Hsi’s ideas a little more. I have kept this simple and stripped down, for the I-Ching
to be explained in writing would take an infinite number of volumes of works
and you still would have not explained it all. It is said even Buddha
himself stated if he had fifty more years to live, he would spend it studying
the I-Ching and he still would have not grasped all it has to offer. So with this in mind I
will share with you the little bit of knowledge I have of the study of the
I-Ching, and its relation to the martial art of pakua.
This
symbol represents what the Chinese call “Wu Ji” the “one”, the beginning, where
all things originated, the one thing that existed before time and space, the
energy that sparked creation and life, what some might refer to as God.
Here
where most scholars begin their disagreement, the I-Ching states that when the
one divided, creation began, when the one divided it created the two elementary
forms. These two forms are represented by a broken line:
, and a whole line:
, the argument is, if a circle is divided once it will only
be in two parts, but the broken and unbroken line would represent three
divisions not two, so the circular representation of the one is wrong, but I
disagree and find it a simple fact that the original division should be
represented by a whole and broken line. I will try to explain why.

![]()
Figure 1 figure
2
As we see, the circle is made
from a whole unbroken line, this circle, in figure one, shows how a circle is
an unbroken line. When the circle divides the line is broken (figure 2), thus
we have a whole line and a broken line. Simple enough?
When the
one divides, it does exactly that, divides. In its most pure division, the one
divides into two. This is the beginning, and this is what can be referred to as
“the big bang”, or the “divine creation”, the “first act of God”, this is the
moment when time began and space formed, this is the beginning of motion.
In the I-Ching this initial
division is referred to as:
Yang Yin
![]()
Unison Division
Noon Midnight
Rising Falling
Outer Inner
Push Pull
Upward Downward
Clockwise Counter
clockwise
(I have italicized the things that refer to
the martial arts)
See a
pattern developing here?
When the “two elementary forms” divide they create the
“four embolic symbols”. They are:
![]()
Pure Unison Pure Division
Summer Winter Spring Fall
Noon Midnight 6am 6pm
Father Mother Daughter Son
When the four embolic symbols
divide they create the eight trigrams, or “ Pa Kua”.

Yang Yang Yang Yang
Earth Earth Fire Fire
South South East North East East
Stomach Spleen Pericardium Heart
Orange Orange Red Red
9 4 8 3
Heaven Subconscious Mind Spirit
Earth Venus Neptune Mercury

Yin Yin Yin Yin
Wood Water Air Water
North Northwest Southwest West
Liver Kidney Lung Bladder
Violet Blue Yellow Green
1 6 2 7
Nature Intent Skin Body
Uranus Saturn Mars Jupiter